Fact-checking AI
Get a second opinion on an AI answer.
AI can state a wrong thing confidently. Keplar asks several models and shows where they split, so you know which parts of an answer to verify yourself.
Try it now. No signup.
Free runs on free open models and never needs a card.
What disagreement tells you
If several independent models give the same answer, that's some comfort. If they disagree, that part is a candidate for checking. It's a pointer for your own checking, not a verdict.
What Keplar doesn't do
- It doesn't guarantee an answer is accurate.
- It doesn't check claims against the web or primary sources. Sources shown are the ones the models cite.
- It can't tell you the minority is wrong: sometimes it is right.
A sensible routine
Ask, read the disagreements, then verify the points that matter in a primary source such as a textbook, an official guidance page or a professional.
Honest about limits
Keplar can be wrong, even when the models agree. Agreement is a signal, not proof. Keplar does not look things up on the web yet, and the sources shown under an answer are the ones the models cite; Keplar has not checked them.
The Free plan runs on free open models, which can be slower when they are busy, and their hosts may log prompts. Health, legal and money answers are general information, not professional advice.
Keep reading
Questions
Does Keplar stop hallucinations?
No. It can reduce the chance you miss one, by showing where models disagree, but any model can be wrong, and models can agree on a wrong answer.
Does it cite sources?
It shows sources the models cite. Keplar hasn't checked those sources, and it doesn't browse the web yet.
Can I rely on it for medical or legal advice?
No. Answers are general information, not professional advice.